EBA's Enria: stress tests complicated by multi-speed CRR

State-specific timelines and other options are making it difficult to compare test data, EBA chairman tells UK parliamentary committee

andrea-enria
Andrea Enria, EBA

The multi-speed implementation of prudential rules in Europe under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) is causing inconsistencies between member states, with each moving at a different pace. That is causing problems for the EU's soon-to-be-published stress tests, according to Andrea Enria, chairman of the European Banking Authority (EBA), which administers the tests.

"In the implementation of the CRR there is a calendar for the phasing in of the new requirements with a lot of discretion

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here