Expectiles behave as expected

Expectiles have been mooted as an alternative risk measure to value-at-risk (VAR) and expected shortfall. Here, Richard Martin derives their saddlepoint approximation and shows that their risk contributions are essentially the same as those of expected shortfall

risk-contributions

A recent criticism of the expected shortfall risk measure is that it is not elicitable (Gneiting 2011). This means that one cannot, in a backtesting procedure, make point forecasts of it and check whether the forecasting procedureworks (see Cont, Deguest and Scandolo (2010) for a fuller discussion of this concept). The discussion of this is still at an early stage, and the author is not convinced that it is an insuperable problem. However, Ziegel (2013) has recently pointed out that expectiles

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here