Integrating risk management with the investment process - a Munich Re case study

The perennial challenge for insurers and reinsurers is to make certain that the assets they hold will cover all their present and future liabilities. Traditionally, companies have sought to manage the risk of a shortfall through careful design and pricing of products, while investing accumulated premiums with the aim of maximising their value. However, this approach can lead to a disconnection between the liabilities and the assets meant to cover them, which can become more pronounced and problematic during periods of market stress. Christian Dahmen, Markus Hummel and Curt Burmeister discuss how risk was integrated into the investment process at Munich Re

munich-re-main-building

Strengthening the connection between risk management and the investment process is a key step insurers need to take to be able to close the gap between assets and liabilities. The vast majority of Munich Re's assets (€210 billion market value as of September 30, 2013) are managed by the Munich Ergo Asset Management (MEAG) arm of the business.

Integrating risk management with the investment process in such a broad-based insurance enterprise, which comprises 70 legal entities of varying sizes

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here