Cost of control: balancing risk and expense

Banks typically build up layers of controls over time, creating extra cost and complexity, without going back to ask whether the controls remain relevant. One bank has developed a methodology to analyse whether the risk posed by a process is worth the costs of controlling it. By Iain Le Couteur and Rowland Weal

swiss balance

Banks face a tough set of challenges. Regulators are drawing up an assortment of new rules on capital, liquidity, and recovery and resolution, while some institutions are undergoing complex integrations, divestments and restructuring. One issue cuts through all this change: risk management.

Plenty of questions need to be asked: are banks doing enough risk management; is there total transparency of the risks being run; what level of risk is acceptable; and for what return should those risks be

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here