Financial network risk

Both macroeconomics and financial theory have failed to deal adequately with systemic risk. However, other disciplines have much to teach us about the stability and fragility of complex dynamic systems, argues David Rowe

risk-davidrowe-gif

Systemic risk is all the rage these days, exemplified by the widespread call for macro-prudential supervision. It is tempting to feel that, like the weather, everybody talks about systemic risk but nobody does anything about it. That situation may now be changing. Discussion is growing around the need for financial theory and analysis to absorb lessons from other disciplines concerning the behaviour of complex adaptive dynamic systems. These other disciplines include epidemiology, aircraft

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here