How op risk mitigants affect regulatory capital

For banks to develop an efficient operational risk hedging strategy, they need to consider the capital impact of the four main mitigant types: insurance, business continuity management, controls and staff training. By Niclas Hageback

As with any other risk types, levels of operational risk can be reduced through the use of mitigants. For a bank developing its op risk framework under the new Basel capital Accord’s advanced measurement approach (AMA), there are four main mitigants to consider: insurance, business continuity management, controls and staff training. AMA grants different capital recognition depending on the type of mitigant, but indirectly all of them will affect the amount of regulatory capital held against op

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here