US Congressman calls for op risk redraft

A Congressman and members of the banking industry lambasted the operational risk capital charge in Basel II at a fresh set of hearings, The New Basel Accord: Private Sector Perspective, held in the House of Representatives' Financial Services Committee in late June.

“I do not feel that our Federal regulators have adequately addressed the concerns regarding Pillar I treatment of operational risk expressed in a November 3, 2003 letter” to the US supervisors, said Paul Gillmor, a Congressman from Ohio and member of the committee. Written as a comment letter for the US banking agencies’ advance notice of proposed rule-making, the document strongly criticised several aspects of both Basel II and the US’s proposed implementation efforts.

“In the US,” said

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here