Banks face challenge assessing benefits of Basel II op risk approaches, says Andersen

Calculating the benefit for banks of adopting the more complex methods of arriving at an operational risk capital charge is very challenging because of uncertainties over the factors involved.

This is the view of professional services firm Andersen in comments on Basel II, the new capital adequacy accord that global banking regulators want to bring into effect for large international banks in 2004.

Andersen (formerly Arthur Andersen) says Basel II is likely to mean investment in technology for many banks because the ability to collect, store and analyse data is the key to measuring operational risk.

Basel II will require banks for the first time to reserve capital against the risk

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here