The three-way knock-on effect

Peter Nance and Lin Franks look at the interplay between market, credit, and operational risks and consider how firms might approach implementing an integrated company-wide system to tackle them

Some of the most notorious derivatives debacles of the 1990s resulted from companies having large operational exposure while paying little or no attention to market and credit exposure.

Take Barings Bank, which – thanks to insufficient monitoring of market and credit activity combined with the failure of operational safeguards – lost $2 billion and ultimately filed for bankruptcy. Other examples include Orange County California, which lost $1.7 billion on interest rate swaps; Metallgesellschaft

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here