Regulators need to rethink their approach to op risk
Feel pity for your regulator. Although financial firms have been caught out badly by the current credit crunch and spin-off events, it is the regulators who will be burning the midnight oil in the coming months. To help them in their contemplations, I offer some thoughts.
First, they are faced with a true paradox. The internationalisation of financial services means regulators must work more closely together to properly supervise individual firms. In doing so, supervisors are rightly developing an understanding of, and sharing around, best practices for risk management. As a result, firms are gradually adopting similar approaches to risk, to meet regulatory approval. Which means, in turn, that firms are all acting similarly in times of crisis - their whistles and dials all tell them to do the same thing at the same time. This goes beyond procyclicality. A world of lemming banks is a systemic nightmare.
Which raises the next issue of importance - the procyclicality of operational risk. In times of stress firms are raising their overall capital levels to keep the supervisors sweet. But across the industry, this is contributing to announcements of job losses - and historically those losses have hit non-revenue generating parts of organisations hardest. The very parts that look after systems and controls. This can't be good.
This next issue really sticks in my craw. I've read several hundred pages of regulatory output about the current market crisis and have yet to stumble on the phrase 'operational risk'. It hasn't been mentioned in discussion about the over-the-counter derivatives processing issue. It wasn't mentioned in mortgage origination analysis. No sight of it in text about compensation and human resources issues. Or the new product approval processes that broke down. Or around the systems and controls that got trodden underfoot for existing products.
Why no mention of operational risk?
Frankly, if there ever was a time when regulators should be pushing the op risk folks into the limelight, it is now. The discipline was created to understand and either prevent or mitigate these very sorts of problems.
In fact, I'll go further. Why should regulators expect firms to give operational risk executives their proper place at the table, when they themselves don't? Regulators - like deer in the headlights - are trapped in their credit and market risk comfort zones and are sending out the wrong message about operational risk to firms.
This needs to change, and fast.
Have a good month!
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Banks urged to boost third-party scrutiny amid AML crackdown
Three US regulators highlight deficiencies in banks’ due diligence on fintech partners
Clearing members welcome JSCC initial margin reforms
Stress loss add-ons touted as path to ensure defaulter pays and default fund contributions shrink
Backtesting correlated quantities
A technique to decorrelate samples and reach higher discriminatory power is presented
Could Trump presidency herald $27bn margin call on World Bank?
Think-tank’s policy plan to pull US out of multilateral threatens AAA rating, ending collateral exemption
Op risk data: Shady loans robbing Reliance of $1.1bn
Also: H20’s less-than-liquid holdings, Ripple ripped for $125m, and more WhatsApp slaps expected. Data by ORX News
Banks must close the loop on counterparty credit risk
Following a series of market and industry credit risk events, regulatory scrutiny of counterparty credit risk management practices is increasing. Now, more than ever, banks must ensure they are optimising their approaches to credit risk mitigation
Should banks risk lightning hitting twice for CrowdStrike?
Bank tech teams divided on whether to give security vendor a second chance after update crash
Risk management overhauls juggle speed and independence
Some banks say the 1.5 line of defence responds faster to risk, but supervisors are still divided