
A letter to the editor

Dear Ms. Davis:
I read with great interest your Editor's letter from the December 2006 issue of OpRisk and Compliance. I am a friend and admirer of Ali Samad-Khan's. I happen to share his and your views regarding the crossroad for operational risk.
By way of background, I am a US actuary who has spent the last five years in ERM for both insurers and organisations in general, including banks. My take on this is the industry has spent a lot of effort on op risk measurement and management, and has made great progress. These efforts have resulted in incredible amounts of fundamental, detailed data. What is needed now is an analytic decision-making framework that can translate this risk information into credible decision support for leadership. For assistance with that framework, I modestly propose one consider checking with the risk analytics professionals who have supported the insurance industry for hundreds of years -- actuaries.
I authored a paper for the 2006 ERM Symposium (www.ermsymposium.org) entitled Applying Actuarial Techniques to Operational Risk Modeling.
Citing from the abstract: "There is a growing need for effective, practical methods of operational risk analysis in all industries. Risk professionals are learning to develop business-unit-level risk distributions, combine those distributions into an aggregate risk model, and use that aggregate risk model to either assign risk charges back to the business units, or to evaluate cost-benefit of mitigation strategies. Operational risk modeling is structurally similar to actuarial risk modeling. The operational risk community will benefit from learning actuarial techniques that can be applied to operational risk modeling... First, the paper will outline how operational risk management is similar to an internal insurance program. Second, it will discuss an internal risk modeling framework that ties together risk exposure, likelihood, severity and correlation into an aggregate loss model. Finally, using the model output, it will present several methods to transparently reward risk mitigation efforts and attribute risk costs to their sources."
To translate for your banking-savvy audience, many of the risks bankers are used to dealing with are hedgeable and liquid. Operational risk, at least thus far, is not. It is an 'incomplete market' risk, just like insurance, specialised lending, real estate and hedge funds. These classes require different techniques than, for example, equity market or interest rate risk.
I am hopeful this contribution helps some of your readership.
Kind regards,
Donald Mango, FCAS, MAAA
Guy Carpenter Instrat, Morristown, New Jersey
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Treasury selloff challenges back-office systems, data feeds
FIS and Trading Technologies suffered downtime during peak activity
Market whipsaw spurs calls to rethink buy-side stress-testing
Risk Live Boston: Morgan Stanley and BlackRock urge rethink of scenario assumptions and top-down factor models
Top 10 op risks: AI arms race leaves risk teams playing catch-up
As firms invest for fear of being left behind, op risk managers urge caution on data, controls and access
Deutsche’s Americas CRO on risk-taking in choppy markets
Risk Live Boston: Risk managers must stay alive to sudden market moves, but volatility can also bring opportunity, says Jonathan Hummel
Tariff turbulence piles pressure on banks’ VAR models
Backtesting breaches start to mount, but too early to tell if regulatory intervention needed
Ice eyes year-end launch for Treasury clearing service
Third entrant expects Q2 comment period for new access models that address ‘done-away’ accounting hurdle
Top 10 op risks: Why cyber risk looms larger than its losses
Fast-moving threat landscape and increased supplier concentration keep infosec top of the table
DeepSeek success spurs banks to consider do-it-yourself AI
Chinese LLM resets price tag for in-house systems – and could also nudge banks towards open-source models
Most read
- Trump tariffs turn swap spreads into ‘pain trade’
- FX liquidity ‘worse than Covid’ amid tariff volatility, dealers say
- The end of the world, or an artificial crisis?