IN BRIEF

ISDA finished off its official 60-page response to the Basel Committee's proposals for changing the Capital Accord in mid-February, and published the document on 1 March. As indicated in last month's Operational Risk, the industry is not happy with the proposals for a capital charge on banking op risk. In a six-page section on op risk, ISDA made it clear that it thinks an industry-wide charge for op risk "would be poorly specified and would introduce many distortions into the world's financial

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here