IAFE releases op risk white paper for buy-side firms
The International Association of Financial Engineers (IAFE) yesterday released a white paper on operational risk for buy-side institutions, which concludes that business reputation rather than Basel-inspired regulation is the real driver for implementing robust operational risk management systems.
“Although it is generally agreed that operational risk does not lend itself to measurement in the same way as market or credit risk, there are models and methodologies used by banking and insurance communities that can be adopted by fund companies,” the IAFE said. “[The] establishment of a progressive operational risk culture by the use of communication and educational techniques... along with self-assessment questionnaires and operational risk models and scenario testing, comprise an important marketing cache for an operational risk manager,” the association added.
The impending Basel II capital requirements mean that several buy-side operations within major global banks are currently working on establishing operational risk cultures within their institutions, and pushing out “ownership” of risk to the business managers, the IAFE added. But the professional body claimed that these institutions are focusing beyond modelling and regulatory issues by establishing programmes that have strong business and client relationship justifications.
“Ultimately, managing operational risk within a buy-side organisation means upholding promises to clients. Breach of fiduciary trust is a major operational risk within this community, and what ultimately leads to lawsuits and ‘headline risk',” the paper continued. “One important method for managing fiduciary risk is to learn from the failings of other firms in order to avoid similar mishaps within one’s own firm.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Why better climate data doesn’t always mean better decision-making
Risk Benchmarking research finds model and systems integration challenges almost as limiting to effective climate risk management
CanDeal looks to simplify third-party risk management
Six-bank vendor due diligence utility seeks international reach
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Italy’s spread problem is not (always) a credit story
Occasional doubts over Italy’s role in the monetary union adds political risk premium, argues economist
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
AI spend in US could be good for bonds in Europe – finance chiefs
Development of AI is capital-intensive, but adoption less so, which could favour EU
Climate risk managers’ top challenge: a dearth of data
Risk Benchmarking: Banks see client engagement and lender data pooling as solutions to climate blind spots – but few expect it to happen soon
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit