S&P: Two years of problems ahead
The effects of the credit crisis could last up to two years, according to analysts at rating agency Standard & Poor's.
Azarchs named over-leverage and subprime exposure as the two main problems facing major financial institutions - of these, subprime was by far the more serious, she said.
"Over-exuberant underwriting created valuation issues for the loans, but it seems to be working its way through; I think banks will get out of it at the current mark-to-market and maybe with some clawback."
S&P listed 10 major banks with exposure to leveraged loans totalling $302.3 billion at the end of September; gross write-offs so far total $12.13 billion.
Write-offs in the mortgage-backed securities sector have been more severe - Citigroup and Merrill Lynch have both made write-offs of 27% of their total exposure, for example.
"What concerns us is the risk management implications," Azarchs said. "For example, Citigroup - how did banks allow such a large pileup of warehousing [these securities]?" Analyst Vicki Wagner added: "We still haven't seen the full effect of the mortgage malaise on the general economy. It could affect the economy across the board. The risk management capacity has fallen short in some cases, because the market was much more unpredictable and volatile than the technology could cope with."
See also: Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch reveal billions more subprime damage
Risk USA: Crowded trade increases turmoil again, say CROs
Risk USA: Rate cuts do not “bail out Wall St”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Banks urged to boost third-party scrutiny amid AML crackdown
Three US regulators highlight deficiencies in banks’ due diligence on fintech partners
Clearing members welcome JSCC initial margin reforms
Stress loss add-ons touted as path to ensure defaulter pays and default fund contributions shrink
Backtesting correlated quantities
A technique to decorrelate samples and reach higher discriminatory power is presented
Could Trump presidency herald $27bn margin call on World Bank?
Think-tank’s policy plan to pull US out of multilateral threatens AAA rating, ending collateral exemption
Op risk data: Shady loans robbing Reliance of $1.1bn
Also: H20’s less-than-liquid holdings, Ripple ripped for $125m, and more WhatsApp slaps expected. Data by ORX News
Banks must close the loop on counterparty credit risk
Following a series of market and industry credit risk events, regulatory scrutiny of counterparty credit risk management practices is increasing. Now, more than ever, banks must ensure they are optimising their approaches to credit risk mitigation
Should banks risk lightning hitting twice for CrowdStrike?
Bank tech teams divided on whether to give security vendor a second chance after update crash
Risk management overhauls juggle speed and independence
Some banks say the 1.5 line of defence responds faster to risk, but supervisors are still divided