Industry panel: avoid one-size-fits-all approach to OTC derivatives
A panel of industry experts on June 9 urged the US House Financial Services Subcommittee to steer clear of broad, one-size-fits-all regulation for over-the-counter derivatives.
Testifying before the subcommittee, Timothy Murphy, foreign currency risk manager at consumer products company 3M, underlined the importance of OTC derivatives to companies looking to manage their exposure to foreign exchange, interest rates and commodities, and voiced "strong concerns" about the impact regulation could have on the market. He emphasised that not all OTC derivatives were involved in triggering or exacerbating the financial crisis, and therefore "not all OTC derivatives should be treated the same".
Murphy - whose views were echoed by Don Thompson, managing director and associate general counsel at JP Morgan - opposed any mandate to transfer all derivatives to clearing houses or exchanges. Thompson warned the standardisation of OTC derivatives - which moves towards clearing and exchanges would require - would "limit [companies'] ability to manage risk". In particular, companies would be required to dynamically post collateral - potentially increasing operating costs - and would not qualify for hedge accounting, leaving them open to market volatility.
Moreover, most panel members were keen to stress the benefits of companies being able to have OTC derivatives tailored to their needs. "Customisation does not necessarily mean complexity," explained Thompson.
Robert Pickel, chief executive of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, underlined the work Isda and the industry had already undertaken with respect to standardisation. Pickel pledged continued support to regulators in helping develop further regulation for the OTC derivatives market, while underlining the market's central role in the financial services industry.
Meanwhile, Christian Johnson, professor at the University of Utah School of Law, warned against overly harsh regulation, as the OTC derivatives market is a "truly global industry that will move towards wherever it is easiest to trade".
In opening remarks, the majority of the subcommittee acknowledged the importance of OTC derivatives to risk management practices for US companies. Republican congressman Tom Price said: "When used appropriately, [derivatives] can be a very effective risk management tool." Price also accepted the particular importance of OTC derivatives and cautioned against implementing one-size-fits-all regulatory measures.
This positive view of OTC derivatives was not shared by all subcommittee members, however. "At best these derivatives are insurance; at worse they are a bet at the casino," said Democrat congressman Brad Sherman.
See also: Geithner outlines regulations for over-the-counter market
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
On geopolitical risk, G-Sibs choose their battles
Conflicts – both existing and threatened – raise concern among banks, but many are still grappling to weave the risk into their frameworks
Margin calls jumped threefold as global markets sold off
FCMs claim no client defaults, but episode revives complaints of procyclical margining
No end of peer-to-peer demand for securities financing
After Archegos, buy side turns to fellow asset managers for diversity and liquidity in securities financing and repo
CrowdStrike outage spurs rethink on ‘critical’ vendors
Some want US regulators to designate tech firms that pose risks to financial stability
Why was Archegos worse than the Fed’s five-fund stress test?
Some believe Credit Suisse was an outlier, but others say the CCAR results underestimated risks
For compliance risk, the big get bigger
Second-line teams have been growing at US G-Sibs – and are set to continue – while Europeans’ flatline
Déjà vu for common domain model
Piecemeal progress on ambitious derivatives data standard raises questions over business case
Between the lines: why banks are rethinking risk management
Lloyds is not the only bank wanting to reshuffle the three lines of defence as tech risks grow