S&P unveils new ratings model
International rating agency Standard & Poor's is to introduce a new partial guarantee model to help companies seeking to upgrade their credit ratings. The model marks a move away from the weak-link rating approach currently being used, where corporations have to provide 100% guarantees to enhance the ratings of their existing obligations.
S&P argued that companies in Latin America and other emerging markets stand to benefit most from the new rating methodology, since it will be an inexpensive and easily attainable way of reaching an investment-grade level and reduce their cost of financing in local and international markets.
"As Latin America and other emerging markets brace for a global economic downturn, companies located in these regions will have to look for creative ways to meet their local and cross-border funding needs," said Rosario Buendia, managing director of S&P’s Latin America structured finance group. "[To] meet the current needs of our customers, we will continue to monitor market developments and create products and services to help our customers meet their financing goals."
The partial guarantee model does have stipulations that limit rating upgrades. The maximum rating elevation for a company using this method is three notches, and the credit rating on the issue can never be equal to the rating of the guarantor. The model does not apply to short-term obligations and the guarantee must be in a form that is highly liquid and has little volatility.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Banks urged to boost third-party scrutiny amid AML crackdown
Three US regulators highlight deficiencies in banks’ due diligence on fintech partners
Clearing members welcome JSCC initial margin reforms
Stress loss add-ons touted as path to ensure defaulter pays and default fund contributions shrink
Backtesting correlated quantities
A technique to decorrelate samples and reach higher discriminatory power is presented
Could Trump presidency herald $27bn margin call on World Bank?
Think-tank’s policy plan to pull US out of multilateral threatens AAA rating, ending collateral exemption
Op risk data: Shady loans robbing Reliance of $1.1bn
Also: H20’s less-than-liquid holdings, Ripple ripped for $125m, and more WhatsApp slaps expected. Data by ORX News
Banks must close the loop on counterparty credit risk
Following a series of market and industry credit risk events, regulatory scrutiny of counterparty credit risk management practices is increasing. Now, more than ever, banks must ensure they are optimising their approaches to credit risk mitigation
Should banks risk lightning hitting twice for CrowdStrike?
Bank tech teams divided on whether to give security vendor a second chance after update crash
Risk management overhauls juggle speed and independence
Some banks say the 1.5 line of defence responds faster to risk, but supervisors are still divided