Natexis hit by heavy equity derivatives losses
French bank Natexis Banques Populaires has made significant losses from its equity derivatives trading business due to poor risk control and failures in the bank’s valuation models.
The French bank said the revaluation of its short- and medium-term derivatives positions would “carve a large slice” out of its capital markets group profits for the second half. “We’ve heard that they [Natexis] may have lost as much as €30 million from exotic option positions,” said a dealer from the equity derivatives group at another European bank, who spoke to RiskNews on condition of anonymity. The spokeswoman declined to state the size of the losses, but said capital markets net profits would lie between €15 and €30 million for H2. The bank made an overall net profit of €90 million in the first half.
While the structured equities departments of most banks have faced a torrid trading environment in the past few months, Natexis admitted that its risk management processes had failed to effectively manage its exposures. “The difficulties are exacerbated by the inability of certain valuation models to successfully manage the current extreme volatility,” the bank said in a statement. “Certain anomalies in the data fed into the models have also been detected.”
The spokeswoman said Natexis's management was aware that some of its models used in equity derivatives valuation were “old”. But she added that the extreme volatility in the equity markets during July and August caught bank staff by surprise.
A number of dealers have expressed concern that newer entrants in the structured equity products market are failing to manage their risks correctly. Products with embedded cliquets – derivatives equivalent to a series of forward-starting, at-the-money options – are especially difficult to risk manage. This is because a fair valuation requires the correct pricing of the elusive forward volatility smile – the variation of an option’s volatility with strike price and maturity. “Mis-pricings are difficult to prove, but we definitely see competitors with prices that seem inconsistent to us,” Lionel Crassier, Paris-based head of exotic trading in the equity derivatives group at BNP Paribas, told Risk in July.
Natexis said it only uncovered the losses two days ago, and that its internal investigation had taken the most corrective action required to resolve the matter.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Climate risk managers’ top challenge: a dearth of data
Risk Benchmarking: Banks see client engagement and lender data pooling as solutions to climate blind spots – but few expect it to happen soon
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
At BNY, a risk-centric approach to GenAI
Centralised platform allows bank to focus on risk management, governance and, not least, talent in its AI build
Many banks yet to factor climate into credit risk models
Risk Benchmarking: More than a third of banks do not quantify climate risk impact on credit portfolios, study finds
We’re gonna need a bigger board: geopolitical risk takes centre stage
As threats multiply, responsibility for geopolitical risk is shifting to ERM teams
CROs shoulder climate risk load, but bigger org picture is murky
Risk Benchmarking: Dedicated teams vary wildly in size, while ownership is shared among risk, sustainability and the business
Climate Risk Benchmarking: explore the data
Risk Benchmarking: View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 43-bank study, covering climate governance, physical and transition risks, stress-testing, technology, and regulation
‘The models are not bloody wrong’: a storm in climate risk
Risk Benchmarking: Risk.net’s latest benchmarking exercise shows banks confronting decades-long exposures, while grappling with political headwinds, limited resources and data gaps