Basel Committee plans new default risk capital requirements
Consultation will explore new measures in response to credit crunch
The Basel Committee is planning to introduce a new requirement for capital to be held against default risk, in response to widespread difficulties institutions have experienced during the global credit crunch.
At the end of its October meeting, the Committee announced it “has been working to introduce new standards for banks to hold capital against the default risk associated with complex, less liquid credit products in the trading book”.
“The Committee agreed to seek public consultation on the proposed standards and to assess their impact on banks' capital requirements,” it continued.
The Committee offered no further details on the proposals or a timeframe within which it expects to commence consultation.
The announcement was not wholly unexpected. Earlier this year, the Committee initiated a review of jurisdictions' approaches to supervising and regulating funding liquidity risk, taking into account lessons learned from the recent market turbulence. The review focuses on how liquidity risk is assessed by banks and supervisors under the assumption of stressed market conditions, as well as the risks related to off-balance-sheet exposures.
Basel II has come in for criticism in recent months over the role it might or might not have played in lessening the impact of the subprime mortgage meltdown. Observers have suggested the accord has encouraged the securitisation of mortgage pools to move the holdings off balance sheet, thereby avoiding the requirement to hold capital against them, and deepening the crisis.
The Committee, however, reiterated its belief that Basel II has paid dividends for compliant institutions since the subprime crisis began and pledged to continue to watch market events intently to identify exactly what effect the accord is having.
“Committee members agree that Basel II implementation will help make the capital base more relevant to banks' changing risk profiles and that the Committee will closely monitor its impact. The framework will also serve to create incentives for better risk measurement and management, including for securitisation exposures,” the Committee concluded.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Op risk data: Payday lender Skytrail sees $1.4bn disappear
Also: Cartel claims cost European bond dealers dearly, plus oil price gouging and crypto cover-ups. Data by ORX News
Bankers hope EBA op risk taxonomy will go global
Proposed update to 20-year-old risk map is welcomed, but international co-ordination urged
Marex plots interest rate clearing push
UK broker is live on LCH and plans to be a “day one” clearing member on FMX
Eurex default fund reshuffle leaves members frustrated
Clearing members say concentration margin add-ons would be fairer than buffer on all portfolios
Tired of fat-finger blunders, G-Sibs turn to robots for help
Big banks speed up shift towards control automation and AI adoption to counter costly human errors, Benchmarking survey finds
CME, FICC in talks to expand cross-margining to client accounts
New rules and account structures will be needed to allow cross-margining by non-members
On geopolitical risk, G-Sibs choose their battles
Conflicts – both existing and threatened – raise concern among banks, but many are still grappling to weave the risk into their frameworks
Margin calls jumped threefold as global markets sold off
FCMs claim no client defaults, but episode revives complaints of procyclical margining