Cebs: Bank risk disclosures could be better

Cebs says banks are holding back on transparency

LONDON - A new report from the Committee of European Banking Supervisors (Cebs) says the banks it examined could do better when it comes to disclosures about their business models, risks and risk management.

The report, ‘Follow-up review of banks’ transparency in 2008 half year results’, says only 45% of the banks in the Cebs sample provided detailed disclosures that met the organisation’s best practice standard for business models. Some 32% provided some disclosure, while 14% gave investors little information and 9% provided none.

The information Cebs is looking for includes “descriptions of the business model and changes, descriptions of strategies and objectives, descriptions of the importance of activities (including instruments and functioning) and descriptions of the role and the extent of the involvement of the institution)”.

Risk management disclosure was even worse, with only 32% providing detailed disclosure and 54% providing only ‘some’ disclosure. The majority of firms failed to disclose such things as market turmoil-specific information describing the nature and extent of risks incurred and liquidity risk. Only about 36% of firms were deemed to be in line with the disclosure best practices Cebs put forward in June.

The report can be found at: http://www.c-ebs.org/formupload/69/691c71d6-85cc-4c2c-81e3-a287fb7c2a4b.pdf.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here