CEBS out with liquidity risk CP part two
CEBS has published the second part to its consultation paper on its technical advice on liquidity risk management
LONDON – The Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS) has opened a public consultation on its advice on liquidity risk management: the second part of its response to the European Commission's Call for Technical Advice on the issue.
The paper sets out CEBS’ preliminary recommendations regarding the management of liquidity risk by credit institutions and investment firms, and the supervision of liquidity risk by EEA prudential authorities. CEBS analysed the 2007-08 crisis, and benefited from input provided in regular meetings with experts representing a broad range of market participants and ad hoc meetings with banking associations and rating agencies, when drafting the recommendations.
The recommendations call for credit institutions and investment firms to have adequate liquidity risk management for both normal and stressed times, including liquidity buffers, robust stress tests, and regularly tested contingency funding plans. The board of directors should approve a liquidity risk strategy and risk tolerance appropriate to the institution’s funding profile and the sophistication of its liquidity risk management, taking into account all liquidity risks, including intra-day and contingent risks, as well as potential constraints on cross-border and intra-group flows. Appropriate responsibilities and incentives should be set by senior management through an internal cost/benefit transfer mechanism.
CEBS’ recommendations to supervisors call for a proportionate approach, allowing for recognition of internal methodologies on a case-by-case basis based on a thorough prior supervisory assessment, while acknowledging the benefits of a more standardised approach for institutions with a simpler liquidity risk profile.
These proposals are generally consistent with the revised Sound Practices for Managing Liquidity in Banking Organizations that have also been published today for consultation by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). There are differences however as CEBS’s report covers the issues listed in the Commission’s Call for Advice and places special emphasis on the supervision of liquidity risk management.
The public consultation period begins today and runs until 1 August 2008, in parallel with the BCBS consultation. It has been shortened from the normal three months in response to a request from the Commission to adjust the work schedule to the timetable of the review of the Capital Requirement Directive. The Commission expects CEBS to deliver its final advice by September 2008.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
AI spend in US could be good for bonds in Europe – finance chiefs
Development of AI is capital-intensive, but adoption less so, which could favour EU
Climate risk managers’ top challenge: a dearth of data
Risk Benchmarking: Banks see client engagement and lender data pooling as solutions to climate blind spots – but few expect it to happen soon
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
At BNY, a risk-centric approach to GenAI
Centralised platform allows bank to focus on risk management, governance and, not least, talent in its AI build
Many banks yet to factor climate into credit risk models
Risk Benchmarking: More than a third of banks do not quantify climate risk impact on credit portfolios, study finds
We’re gonna need a bigger board: geopolitical risk takes centre stage
As threats multiply, responsibility for geopolitical risk is shifting to ERM teams
CROs shoulder climate risk load, but bigger org picture is murky
Risk Benchmarking: Dedicated teams vary wildly in size, while ownership is shared among risk, sustainability and the business
Climate Risk Benchmarking: explore the data
Risk Benchmarking: View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 43-bank study, covering climate governance, physical and transition risks, stress-testing, technology, and regulation