Some 42% pass CFA exams worldwide
Risk management least attractive career for CFA professionals
Forty-two per cent of this year’s candidates working towards the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) qualification passed the exams they sat in June, the CFA Institute has announced.
A near-record number of entrants – 71,897 – took the Level I, II, and III exams leading to the qualification, which is often a prerequisite for financial professionals in investment management, investment banking and financial analysis of stocks, bond and derivatives.
Europe led the way with a 47% pass rate of its 11,732 candidates, even though it had less than half the number of candidates of the US, where 23,221 participants achieved a 44% success rate. But just 28% of the 3,477 examinees in Africa and the Middle East passed the test.
Overall, the results were below the average pass rates since the CFA’s inception in 1963. The Level I and Level II global pass rates were both 40% (average 46% and 51%, respectively), and 50% passed the final Level III (average 67%).
Of all those who passed Level III since 2004, just 12% have opted to specialise in risk management. It is the least popular career path chosen by CFA charterholders – 29% have gone into equity analysis and valuation strategy and 25% have entered portfolio management.
All those who sit for the CFA must have at least four years’ experience in the investment industry, must become a member of the CFA Institute and must sign a commitment to abide by its Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct.
Jeff Diermeier, CFA president and CEO of CFA Institute, said: “The CFA programme is for the serious investment professional. This is an important fact for investors to remember, especially with the current proliferation of less rigorous credentials.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Banks urged to boost third-party scrutiny amid AML crackdown
Three US regulators highlight deficiencies in banks’ due diligence on fintech partners
Clearing members welcome JSCC initial margin reforms
Stress loss add-ons touted as path to ensure defaulter pays and default fund contributions shrink
Backtesting correlated quantities
A technique to decorrelate samples and reach higher discriminatory power is presented
Could Trump presidency herald $27bn margin call on World Bank?
Think-tank’s policy plan to pull US out of multilateral threatens AAA rating, ending collateral exemption
Op risk data: Shady loans robbing Reliance of $1.1bn
Also: H20’s less-than-liquid holdings, Ripple ripped for $125m, and more WhatsApp slaps expected. Data by ORX News
Banks must close the loop on counterparty credit risk
Following a series of market and industry credit risk events, regulatory scrutiny of counterparty credit risk management practices is increasing. Now, more than ever, banks must ensure they are optimising their approaches to credit risk mitigation
Should banks risk lightning hitting twice for CrowdStrike?
Bank tech teams divided on whether to give security vendor a second chance after update crash
Risk management overhauls juggle speed and independence
Some banks say the 1.5 line of defence responds faster to risk, but supervisors are still divided