US stress tests: 'serious concerns remain' warns Congress
Congressional investigators warn bank stress tests not enough
WASHINGTON, DC - Congressional investigators have released their report into the bank stress tests conducted by the US Treasury and Federal Reserve earlier this year, saying the exercises were solidly based but that "serious concerns remain".
The Congressional Oversight Panel's 164-page report, 'Stress testing and shoring up bank capital', makes a number of recommendations as a result of studying the methods used in the tests.
The panel, created to oversee the spending of $700 billion in Troubled Assets Relief Program funds, says although the methods used were "conservative and reasonable", the worst-case scenario - designed as the baseline for recapitalisation - did not go far enough.
The report says the increase in US unemployed to 9.4% in May meant the assumed 2009 rate of 8.9% used in the tests' most adverse scenario had been called into question, potentially necessitating a further recapitalisation of US banks.
The panel says economic factors such as the unemployment rate, coupled with banks' continuing tenure of toxic or illiquid assets, mean a reappraisal is necessary, leading to further tests by the federal authorities and internal exercises by the banks for disclosure.
Ten US banks failed Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner's stress tests, requiring a combined $74.6 recapitalisation when the results were published in May. This possibly influenced decisions by the UK Financial Services Authority and the Committee of European Banking Supervisors to adopt a different method for their own banking stress tests, keeping the results secret.
The role of stress tests in US regulation is set to increase. The report suggests regulators make more use of them to promote and maintain financial stability, and prevent systemic risk.
With this in mind, it seems possible the new systemic risk body touted for creation by the Obama administration, which would be composed of Treasury, Federal Reserve and other regulatory representatives, might be responsible for future industry-wide stress tests.
The Congressional Oversight Panel's report can be read in full here.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Basel stops short on wrong-way risk
New guidelines a step in right direction, but experts warn they won’t prevent another Archegos
On resilience risk, banks prepare to let the bad times roll
Lenders bolster first-line teams and upskill boards as compliance with new rules bites
Complex EU active account reporting could drive trades out of UK
Draft Emir rules might not force large volumes to move to EU, but will make compliance difficult
Strategies for navigating market volatility in the post-US election landscape
This article examines the key themes of a recent webinar, sponsored by S&P Global Market Intelligence, on market volatility following the US election, including inflation risks, commodities, geopolitical uncertainty, ESG considerations and the role of…
Risk.net’s top 10 investment risks for 2025
Fresh concerns this year include a trade war, a stock market crash and growing social discord
For banks, change risk is inevitable; managing it, optional
Regional bank survey shows steady growth of dedicated change risk functions and adoption of leading indicators
Clearing members ponder the purpose of CME’s mystery FCM
Some think licence will be used to boost crypto clearing capacity, but many questions remain
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices