Asia Risk Congress: LCR drives expanding regional liquidity swap market
Insurers providing liquidity swaps to banks is a growing trend in Asia
The increasing need by banks for liquid assets to meet the requirements of Basel III is driving a burgeoning liquidity swap market in Asia, according to two insurers from the region.
The liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) is due to be implemented in 2015 according to the timetable outlined by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and will require banks to hold an increasing amount of liquid assets.
According to insurers speaking at the Asia Risk Congress 2012 in Hong Kong yesterday, the need to meet the LCR has seen the creation of a liquidity swap market in region, whereby insurers lend out long-dated assets on a collateralised basis to banks for a fee.
Stephan van Vliet, head of investment strategy at ING in Hong Kong, said ING has transacted such swaps in countries across the region including Japan.
"We can do this with loan books where we get an extra return over the equivalent publics and also using private placements but regulators require onerous restrictions on insurers to do the loans themselves. I think that should change," he said. "Especially with the large amount of infrastructure that still needs to be built in Asia, taking on loan books is one way of co-investing with banks."
Chandresh Shah, chief risk officer at Aviva in Singapore, didn't say whether his firm has engaged in this activity but he did point out that insurers have ample liquidity and that the risk of "cash surrenders" – where insurance companies' liquidity would be impaired by paying out on a policy – is relatively low.
"My view is that liquidity is not an issue for most insurers that have standard assets. Even in the worst stress scenario an insurance company will not face anything more than 20% of its balance sheet value as 'surrenders', and liquid assets such as government bonds are [around] 75%," he said.
"This contrasts with banks where banking assets can't be liquidated in the long term and behavioural assets such as saving and current accounts can translate into a huge outflow for the [Basel III] LCR if there was a run on a bank," Shah added.
Van Vliet said regulators in Asia were similarly cautious: "Generally regulators are not that comfortable yet with these transactions so there is a whole teaching and lobbying effort but it makes a lot of sense."
However, there is also the challenge of persuading insurance company boards about this approach, Van Vliet said. "Even our own boards need to be taught about these transactions so there is a whole organisational effort to get everybody to the same level of expertise. But this is a great area of opportunity and it's very capital efficient."
While Hong Kong is one of the jurisdictions where banks face a shortage of liquid assets, van Vliet said further engagement with the regulator is required before such transactions can take off.
"With liquidity swaps, an insurer needs to be well measured as these are long-term commitments so from a legal and regulatory perspective you need to be sure that these are allowed. There is a lack of clarity about what the Hong Kong regulator will support but if they were open to engagement on this that would be helpful," van Vliet said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Solvency II
Lack of transposition to delay Mifid II enforcement
Some states won’t have adopted directive before June, making rule-imposition difficult, say lawyers
Capital and funding
Quants propose KVA and FVA accounting framework based on Solvency II regulation
Testing interest rate models for Solvency II applications
Alexey Botvinnik and Vladimir Ostrovski propose a validation method for interest rate models
Eiopa cuts matching adjustment risk margin
UK insurers welcome additional capital relief
Solvency II volatility dampener ineffective for euro periphery
Stress tests expose flaw in formula to calculate volatility adjustment
Solvency II technical draft too harsh, firms claim
Industry representatives call on Eiopa to soften draft specifications
Commission 'must ensure proportionality of Solvency II' rules as MEPs give green light to new regime
Omnibus II approved by European Parliament
EC to restrict deferred tax assets in Solvency II
Rules expected to be tightened on determination of future profits