Sex games - insurers’ options after the ECJ ruling

Insurers have always used gender as a pricing factor but a ruling by the European Court of Justice means this practice must end by 2013. The practical implications of this are huge but, more importantly, does it presage the end of using age as a pricing proxy as well? Laurie Carver reports

chessboard

A lawsuit filed by a Belgian consumer agency is not usually a cause for concern for the insurance industry. But the one filed by Test-Achats in 2004 with the European Court of Justice (ECJ) is an exception.

Test-Achat's concern was the rates charged by insurance firms to policyholders of different genders. A policyholder's sex has been used as a major risk factor input in many types of insurance since the industry's 18th century inception - not least in life insurance, where the longer average

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here