Risk Europe 2003: Industry worried about ‘level playing field’ implementation of Basel II
Bankers and their banking associations are increasingly concerned that the new bank capital Accord Basel II and its European equivalent CAD3 may not be implemented in a consistent manner in different national jurisdictions. These fears were expressed during a plenary panel at Risk Europe, Risk magazine’s eighth annual European conference, in Paris today.
Responding to concerns that the apparent decision in the US to apply Basel II only to a limited number of around a dozen banks could spark calls for a two-tier implementation of the new Accord in the EU, ex-British Bankers Association director John Thirlwell said: “It would not surprise me at all.” He added that such calls could grow once members of the European Parliament have to vote to enshrine the new Accord into European law next year.
While Goshawk and Mulder, along with many delegates attending the conference, criticised Basel II for being too complex, Thirlwell said: “The industry brought it upon itself by seeking consistency.”
Panellists also expressed fears that the transparency requirements for Basel II under Pillar III were being drafted too late. “We have still not seen anything [on this], amazingly,” said Thirlwell.Basel II is due for implementation in late 2006.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Solvency II
Lack of transposition to delay Mifid II enforcement
Some states won’t have adopted directive before June, making rule-imposition difficult, say lawyers
Capital and funding
Quants propose KVA and FVA accounting framework based on Solvency II regulation
Testing interest rate models for Solvency II applications
Alexey Botvinnik and Vladimir Ostrovski propose a validation method for interest rate models
Eiopa cuts matching adjustment risk margin
UK insurers welcome additional capital relief
Solvency II volatility dampener ineffective for euro periphery
Stress tests expose flaw in formula to calculate volatility adjustment
Solvency II technical draft too harsh, firms claim
Industry representatives call on Eiopa to soften draft specifications
Commission 'must ensure proportionality of Solvency II' rules as MEPs give green light to new regime
Omnibus II approved by European Parliament
EC to restrict deferred tax assets in Solvency II
Rules expected to be tightened on determination of future profits