EC outlines proposal to regulate rating agencies
The European Commission (EC) today outlined a formal proposal to regulate credit rating agencies, which it hopes will improve the quality of ratings, restore investor confidence and reduce the conflicts of interest “inherent to the ratings business”.
Consequently, the EC wants to bring the agencies firmly under the control of regulators, to ensure they maintain the quality of rating methodologies and act in a transparent manner.
Specifically, the new rules state that rating agencies must not provide advisory services and must not rate financial products if they do not have sufficient quality information. Furthermore, agencies will be required to disclose the models, methodologies and key assumptions they base ratings on, as well as publish an annual transparency report.
Agencies will also need to create an internal function to review the quality of ratings, and appoint a minimum of three independent directors on their boards whose remuneration does not depend on business performance. At least one of those directors should be an expert in securitisation and structured finance.
An EC official told Risk that the proposal would now go through the legislative process; meaning it needs the approval of the European parliament and member states through the Council of the European Union. If it gets the green light, the official said, the proposal would become effective at some stage in 2009, but declined to speculate on exactly when.
“I want Europe to adopt a leading role in this area,” said the EC’s internal market and services commissioner, Charlie McCreevy. “Our proposal goes further than the rules which apply in other jurisdictions. These very exacting rules are necessary to restore the confidence of the market in the ratings business in the European Union.”
There have also been several congressional hearings in the US into the activities of rating agencies. At a hearing of the House Oversight Committee on October 22, rating agencies were blamed for severe oversights and mis-estimates in their ratings, which were a major contributory factor behind the financial crisis. So it would not be surprising if the US authorities introduce their own measures to tighten regulatory controls in the coming months.
See also: Rating agencies "sold their souls"
Ratings agencies must try harder, Sifma says
Restoring ratings
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Solvency II
Lack of transposition to delay Mifid II enforcement
Some states won’t have adopted directive before June, making rule-imposition difficult, say lawyers
Capital and funding
Quants propose KVA and FVA accounting framework based on Solvency II regulation
Testing interest rate models for Solvency II applications
Alexey Botvinnik and Vladimir Ostrovski propose a validation method for interest rate models
Eiopa cuts matching adjustment risk margin
UK insurers welcome additional capital relief
Solvency II volatility dampener ineffective for euro periphery
Stress tests expose flaw in formula to calculate volatility adjustment
Solvency II technical draft too harsh, firms claim
Industry representatives call on Eiopa to soften draft specifications
Commission 'must ensure proportionality of Solvency II' rules as MEPs give green light to new regime
Omnibus II approved by European Parliament
EC to restrict deferred tax assets in Solvency II
Rules expected to be tightened on determination of future profits