Basel IV – a timeline
How Basel's plans to tighten control over banks' internal models have evolved since 2014
In December 2014, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision first floated the idea of restrictions to the internal models banks use to calculate their risk-weighted capital requirements. Two years on, the idea stokes as much controversy as ever. Bankers have dubbed the proposed changes “Basel IV” to underline their potential impact, but regulators reject the tag and claim the rules are merely designed to refine Basel III and prevent regulatory arbitrage.
The Basel Committee has struggled to agree a final package, with the US and EU apparently at loggerheads until a crunch meeting on November 28–29. And no wonder: the proposed model curbs mainly affect credit risk exposures, which comprise around 80% of most banks’ portfolios and include such politically sensitive activities as mortgage lending and financing small businesses.
The central bank governors and heads of supervision who oversee the Basel Committee’s work are due to meet in early January 2017 to thrash out a compromise. Ahead of the meeting, here’s a chance to take a closer look at how the proposals have evolved, and what’s at stake for specific business lines at the banks.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Basel still pushing for capital model floors
Bank treasurers call plan to underpin internal models with standardised floors “unmanageable”
Read moreRegulatory fragmentation drives Basel RWA impasse
European Commissioner rejects model floors that US regulators have already imposed
Read moreBasel to allow IRB models for low-default portfolios
Impact studies showing significant capital increase prompted committee rethink
Read moreBanks reject Basel’s IRB data shortage claim
Internal models remain more accurate than standardised approaches, say industry responses
Read moreBanks battle to preserve ‘good value’ IRB models
Improving credit risk modelling assumptions could soften Basel's push for input floors
Read moreDefault risk floors threaten €72bn of RWAs in EU
Risk.net analysis finds PD floor would hit a swath of low-risk corporate loans at the biggest EU banks
Read moreBanks to ramp up credit risk if Basel scraps internal models
Lobbyists warn banks will add more high-yield debt if forced to follow standardised approach
Read moreCorporates fear price rises if Basel curbs credit risk models
Trade finance exposures would move to standardised approach
Read moreIndustry fears grow ahead of Basel IRB consultation
Biggest share of bank capital at stake as regulators take aim at credit models
Read moreToo many questions in Basel floor plans, industry claims
While standardised rules are being revised, banks say they can't make a call on floors
Read moreHit the floor: banks fear Basel curbs for capital models
Regulators argue a backstop is needed to avoid too-low modelled numbers
Read more