Risk.net poll: Simpler Basel framework is needed

A majority of Risk.net readers think regulators should reduce complexity in the Basel framework, after a recent report shows wide variations in RWAs

maze

Regulators should reduce the complexity of the Basel capital framework and consider simpler alternatives, according to a majority of Risk.net readers.

The Risk survey was conducted in the wake of a report from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, published on January 31, which showed huge variations in the risk-weighted asset (RWA) numbers reported by banks. The differences were found to be largely a result of supervisor-approved modelling choices made by banks, and differing supervisory

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here