Basel liquidity standards due in December
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision is set to unveil quantitative liquidity requirements for public consultation at its quarterly meeting in December, the co-chair of the committee's liquidity working group has told Risk News.
In September 2008, the committee published its Principles for Sound Liquidity Risk Management and Supervision, a revised version of a set of 17 guidelines first written in 2000. While the committee expected banks and supervisors to thoroughly implement the revised guidelines, it offered no binding quantitative metrics for liquidity buffers or structural funding.
But a set of rules now being drawn up by the committee's working group on liquidity will create a liquidity coverage ratio as well as quantitative funding requirements. The liquidity coverage ratio would use a risk-sensitive approach, based on a short period of acute liquidity stress, to calculate a requirement for a pool of high-quality assets that banks would be mandated to hold in a liquidity buffer. The supplementary funding requirements would encourage banks to put greater reliance on stable long-term funding for long-term assets, with quantitative constraints on banks' structural funding to be calculated in due course.
Marc Saidenberg, senior vice president in the bank supervision group at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and co-chair of the working group on liquidity, said that there was a pressing need for quantitative liquidity requirements in parallel with the Basel II capital requirements.
"The framework the Basel Committee is developing would establish a common set of quantitative liquidity requirements for internationally active firms. There was a view held by many within the Basel Committee and within the Financial Stability Board that the liquidity risk principles should be supplemented with a more effective cross-border approach to increasing liquidity resilience," said Saidenberg.
Not all supervisors share the desire for binding liquidity rules. "There is definitely a split view among regulators on how liquidity should be managed," said Lars Söderlind, a member of the working group and senior advisor on market and liquidity risk at Stockholm-based regulator Finansinspektionen. "In Sweden we do not have a lot of appetite for regulatory standards - our approach is more qualitative and we believe the most efficient way to ensure sound liquidity risk management is to require greater transparency from banks on stress testing, contingency plans and quantitative information."
But the Basel Committee's liquidity standards are on their way and will be subjected to a period of consultation and quantitative impact study in early 2010. Although there is no firm date for implementation as yet, Saidenberg is confident they will become binding, with some room for national discretion. "There are elements of liquidity risk which are very reflective of jurisdiction-specific characteristics, so the goal is to have a harmonised common standard that allows authorities to implement certain assumptions appropriate to their particular jurisdiction."
See also: Points of principle
Cebs publishes guidelines on liquidity buffers
Agencies aim to unite US with Basel liquidity risk standards
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US