We need a Basel Accord that emphasises economic not regulatory capital, says Gilbert

Even before the new Basel Accord, Basel II, is implemented, some risk managers already see a need for a Basel III process to rectify flaws in Basel II.

Adam Gilbert, the managing director of the Global Credit Risk Management Group at JP Morgan Chase based in New York, believes the Basel Committee is making a mistake to treat regulatory capital with more importance than economic capital.

He said at the Capital Allocation USA Conference in New York that the major reason for a revised Basel Accord is the need for regulators and the industry to shift emphasis from regulatory capital to economic capital as a basis for business decision-making.

“Econ

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here