CP3 released
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision released its third consultative paper (CP3) this morning, by posting the paper on its website.
The Basel Committee outlined the changes it considered significant to pillar 1 (the section that deals with specific capital charges) in an introduction to the document. There are changes made to the recognition of provisions, qualifying revolving retail exposures, residential mortgages, specialised lending, high volatility commercial real estate, credit derivatives, securitisation and operational risk.
The Basel Committee appears to have included substantial changes to the securitisation portion of the Accord – there was some doubt as to whether those changes would make it into CP3. The changes to the securitisation are a result of both the QIS3 results and responses to a second working paper on securitisation, released in October 2002.
Generally speaking, the committee reaffirms the need for banks to deduct from capital positions that are highly subordinated, but changes have been made to the securitisation framework concerning the treatment of liquidity facilities.
BaselAlert.com’s coverage of CP3 will be ongoing over the next few days, and will include feedback from the industry, regulators and technology experts.
Comments on the paper for the Basel Committee are due in on July 31. The paper is posted at: www.bis.org/bcbs/bcbscp3.htm.BaselAlert.com
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US