Building pillar 2

Risk managers are increasingly turning their attention from pillar 1 to pillar 2 compliance under Basel II. Regulatory guidelines are only giving so much assistance, leaving individual banks to draft their own standards. Kathleen Kearney reports

3-gif

Many leading Asia-Pacific banks have completed the foundation internal ratings-based (IRB) approach to regulatory credit risk management under pillar 1 of the Basel II capital accord and are working on the assessment programme for pillar 2 compliance. While the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has provided a framework for this programme at an international level, there is little guidance as yet coming from regulators in Asia. Hence, banks in the region are flying blind in some key areas -

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here