Urgency and uncertainty

The Basel Committee published further clarification on its proposal for a new incremental risk charge in January. What challenges does this pose from a systems perspective, and how are banks and technology vendors responding? By Clive Davidson

asiarisk-090501-37-gif

It was inevitable that regulators should seek to fill with some urgency the gaps in Basel II exposed by the financial crisis. And it was probably also inevitable that any new rules should be works-in-progress rather than fully formulated policies. With the incremental risk charge (IRC), designed to tighten up the management of risks in bank trading books, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision appears to have combined urgency with uncertainty in equal measure.

Although the deadline for the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here