Basel II securitisation paper expected next week
Global banking regulators hope to issue their working paper on the treatment of asset securitisation under the complex Basel II bank capital accord next week, senior Basel officials said.
But regulators said the pressure of work involved in getting QIS 3 out to more than 200 banks from over 40 countries resulted in a delay to the securitisation paper. The delay was not caused by any disagreements among the technical experts drafting the paper, they added.
The thorny technical question of how to treat the credit risks to banks of asset securitisation was the last major outstanding issue with the much delayed, risk-based Basel II accord that is aimed at making the world’s banking system safer. Asset securitisation occurs when banks put existing loans and credits into a pool and then issue fresh securities backed by the pool.
The QIS 3 package contains the risk-weightings for allotting protective capital against asset securitisation risks that will appear in the paper. The Basel regulators have developed a new methodology for arriving at the weightings where a securitisation is rated by a leading credit-rating agency. They have also adjusted the formula they previously developed for weighting the risks of those securitisations not rated by the agencies. Next week’s paper will seek feedback from national regulators and the banking industry on the proposals.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US