Fitch Risk Management to acquire NetRisk and OpVantage
New York-based Fitch Risk Management, part of rating agency Fitch, plans to acquire NetRisk and its subsidiary, OpVantage, both Connecticut-based risk management companies. The amount of the purchase has not been disclosed.
OpVantage was set up in April 2002 when professional services firm PricewaterhouseCoopers and NetRisk merged their op risk services, resulting in OpVar, an operational loss database. OpVar version 4.0 maps data to the Basel Committee’s quantitative impact study (QIS) loss event categories. Basel II, the new international bank capital Accord, will require banks to set aside capital for operational risks when it is introduced in late 2006, and OpVantage claims OpVar will help users meet the latest qualifying criteria.
The Basel guidelines are one of the main reasons that Fitch Risk Management was interested in acquiring OpVantage. “We think that with the Basel capital allocation guidelines OpVantage will be in demand,” said David Kelson, managing director of Fitch Risk Management. Kelson also said the deal will benefit customers. “We will be able to offer clients one-stop shopping now,” Kelson said.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the architect of Basel II, said earlier this week it would eliminate the floor on capital charges under the advanced approaches to measuring operational risk in the Basel II bank Accord. There were fears within the banking community that the floors would limit banks’ incentive to adopt the more advanced approach.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US