Average 10% cut in SME loan charges possible under Basel II
Loans to smaller businesses under the Basel II bank Accord would on average require 10% less protective capital than loans to larger companies under plans being worked on by global banking regulators.
The threshold for classification as an SME seems likely to be firms with a turnover or sales of €40 million ($44 million) or less, with a 0%-20% range in the downward adjustment of capital charges compared with those for lending to corporations.
Some regulators said the SME problem, which has proved potentially the most divisive of all the aspects of Basel II, is virtually resolved. But others cautioned that a number of issues remained open, including whether the threshold should be higher than €40 million and the adjustment range widened to 0%-25% or more. But the average adjustment should be around 10%, regulators said.
Under a 0%-20% range with a €40 million threshold, for instance, there would be a virtually zero adjustment for a firm with sales of €40 million, rising towards 20% for firms with the lowest turnover.
Key meetings to put the seal on the solution will take place in mid-June with a gathering of the Capital Task Force, the senior sub-grouping of the Basel Committee, and in early July when the task force will meet again ahead of a meeting of the full Basel Committee, regulators said.
Some countries, most notably Germany, where the government faces elections in September, feared that the original Basel II proposals would penalise bank lending to SMEs which are seen in many countries as the engine of economic growth.
The risk-based Basel II Accord will determine how much capital banks will have to set aside to guard against the risks of banking. Credit risk – the risk of bank loans turning sour – is the biggest hazard.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US