European Union Basel II/Cad 3 timetable remains tight
The European Commission’s plans to apply risk-based protective capital rules to banks in the European Union (EU) remain on a tight schedule following yesterday’s progress statement on the Basel II bank Accord by global banking regulators, a Commission spokesman said.
The Commission, which is the EU’s ruling body, wants to enforce capital adequacy rules closely modelled on the Basel II proposals on all banks and investment firms in the 15-nation EU from the time Basel II comes into force.
The Basel Commission confirmed today that it wants to introduce Basel II by the end of 2006.
But the Basel II capital Accord will not be finalised until the fourth quarter of next year. That means the EU will have about two years in which to get the EU version – known as the third capital adequacy directive, or Cad 3 – agreed by the European Council and individual member states. That’s tight, said the spokesman, and EU parliamentary elections scheduled for 2004 could further complicate matters.
Bankers fear that major European banks would be at a disadvantage to their North American and Asia-Pacific rivals if Cad 3 was not introduced at the same time as Basel II. EU banks will not be able to use Basel II – the advanced approaches of which could reduce their capital levels – until Cad 3 is given EU approval.
The Commission is calling on EU member states to ensure their banks reply in detail to the Basel II quantitative impact survey, or QIS 3, that the Basel Committee will send to banks on October 1. QIS 3 will seek information on how banks might be affected by Basel II.
The Commission said it was pleased with the compromise on the treatment of the risks of lending to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The compromise enabled EU member state Germany to lift its objections to Basel II last week. The German government had threatened to veto Basel II if it penalised lending to SMEs.
The SME agreement “should yield levels of capital that are prudent, sound and suitable to the situation of SMEs”, the spokesman said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US