![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
'Unacceptable' for final Basel II rule to reproduce QIS 4 results, says Dugan
While expressing broad support for "the Basel II approach", the US comptroller of the currency, John Dugan, said that this was not "the same thing" as saying that a perfect proposal to implement that approach had been crafted.
Dugan said that QIS 4 results - which projected that Basel II would prompt a median average drop of 26% in minimum required capital and a wide dispersion of results across institutions and portfolios - raised questions.
Consequently, US agencies will observe live Basel II systems, Dugan said, "based on a definite set of agency rules, subject to meaningful supervisory validation and scrutiny". He highlighted the transition period safeguards as critically important in protecting the US banking system. These safeguards are: delaying adoption of Basel II by one year, extending the transition period to three years, and limiting potential reductions in capital requirements during the transition period via the use of so-called capital floors.
Commenting on the the use of such floors, one chief risk officer at a US bank told RiskNews that he viewed the imposition of floors as a "disappointing move away from a principles-based approach".
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US