Basel II regulators lighten Pillar 3 disclosure burden

Global banking regulators said they are significantly reducing the amount of information they will require from banks under a key provision of the proposed Basel II banking accord.

Regulators said they have reduced to hundreds from thousands the items of information that will be required from banks under the third pillar of Basel II. Pillar 3 will require banks to reveal more information so that investors, analysts and customers can better judge their risk management practices. Many banks claimed the initial Pillar 3 proposed requirements were far too burdensome.

But all information will have to be disclosed under the revised proposals. Under the original Pillar 3 proposals banks could opt out of disclosing some of the information nominated by the regulators.

The new proposals are contained in a working paper on Pillar 3 issued today by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the body that in effect regulates international banking and which is the architect of Basel II.

Basel II will stipulate what proportion of their assets large international banks will have to set aside as reserve capital to guard against losses from the risks of the banking business from 2005.

The accord, which is intended to be more risk sensitive than the current Basel I accord, rests on three interdependent pillars. Pillar 1 lays down the capital charges, while Pillar 2 backs up the accord with strong supervision by regulators. Pillar three seeks to subject the banks to market discipline through greater disclosure of information.

The Basel I accord dates from 1988 and has been adopted by over 100 countries.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here