BBA favours colleges of supervisors
The BBA has released recommendations for the use of supervisory colleges
LONDON – The British Bankers’ Association (BBA) has come out in favour of the increased use of supervisory colleges for the regulation of cross-border banks. The report includes proposals for the strengthening and streamlining of banking supervision and how colleges might be best employed.
The BBA highlights the need for colleges to be flexible, with regard to varying composition for regulating individual banks, and the possibility of a two-tiered structure comprising a core college concerned with overall strategy and a wider forum for high-level group-wide discussions and information exchange.
The report says colleges should focus on the group at the consolidated level and have a clear practical understanding of how the college should function day-to-day. The college should be chaired by the banking group’s home regulator, with supervisors present from significant branches and subsidiaries. The colleges should, according to the BBA, also help determine a bank’s Pillar II implementation strategy for Basel II.
Angela Knight, chief executive of the BBA, says: “The British Bankers’ Association believes banking regulation needs to move forward to meet the needs of an industry that increasingly operates across national boundaries. We believe colleges are effective and can build on existing practice to strengthen cross-border supervision, streamline and simplify practice and ensure customers and banks benefit from a system that allows for firm, fair and fast solutions.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US