Pillars II and III stalled in global Basel II implementation
The BIS has announced regulators are deferring the rollout of Pillars II and III
BASEL - The Financial Stability Institute (FSI), part of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), which hosts the Basel Committee, has issued the results of its 2008 survey into the international implementation of Basel II. It reveals many regulators have shown signs of deferring Pillar II and Pillar III progress in the short term. Some 49 jurisdictions are offering to implement the advanced measurement approach for operational risk.
The FSI expects 77 jurisdictions will be implementing Pillars II and III by 2015, but says regulators are putting off implementation in the current regulatory climate.
The most recent 2008 update was sent to 130 countries. Basel II was beginning its roll out across Europe and some Asian jurisdictions when the financial crisis began. The US delayed and is still in the initial stages of implementation.
The FSI says 105 countries have implemented, or plan to implement, the Basel II regulatory capital regime, and that the number of countries implementing the three credit risk approaches has risen since 2006. Some 56 are implementing the advanced internal ratings-based approach to credit risk.
The summary of responses may be downloaded here.
http://www.bis.org/fsi/fsiop2008.pdf?noframes=1
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US