Barristers' boycott could threaten Libor cases

A judge has ordered a halt to a major London fraud trial after lawyers refused to represent the defendants because of cuts to legal aid

judge-wig

Yesterday's decision by a judge to abandon a fraud trial in London due to legal aid cuts could endanger trials of those accused of rigging the Libor interbank rate.

The Public Defender Service for England and Wales had been unable to recruit barristers to represent the defendants in R. v Crawley and others, due to government-imposed 30% cuts on the fees paid to lawyers in the longest and most demanding cases – those expected to last more than 60 days or cost one side more than £150,000

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here