Politically motivated reform creates new risk

Many of the proposed reforms in derivatives market regulation were driven by politics rather than economics. This could lead to an additional source of systemic risk and less effective risk management among end-users, argues David Rowe

david-rowe

It has been said that nothing is more frightening than ignorance in action. If so, then some aspects of the new global consensus on the reform of derivatives market regulation should frighten us to death. Sadly, much of the pressure for regulatory change has been driven by political rather than economic motivations. In all too many cases, secondary effects have been brushed aside or simply not recognised.

A major characteristic of the new conventional wisdom of derivatives regulation is that

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here