UK FSA bans broker for failing to prevent mortgage fraud
The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has banned a London-based mortgage broker for incompetence and failing to prevent fraud. The authority said Kevin Byrne, working at Forest Financial, lacked the integrity and competence to prevent his business being targeted by mortgage fraudsters.
The FSA says its investigation revealed Byrne accepted mortgage referrals from an introducer but failed to undertake due diligence or any basic checks on client information supplied by the introducer. As a result, he submitted seven mortgage applications containing false and misleading information, and at least one customer did not exist.
Since the regulator’s mortgage review last year it has taken a growing number of enforcement actions. This year the FSA has already banned six mortgage professionals (one of whom was also fined) for fraud or incompetence. The regulator has also fined one firm, while Forest Financial becomes the second firm to have its permission cancelled.
The regulator said Byrne’s lack of due diligence led to mortgage applications being submitted with erroneous or fraudulent information. He was found to have certified a number of supporting documents despite never having seen the originals. False passports were used to acquire mortgages and a bank statement for one applicant contained differing sort codes and account numbers on different pages.
“This made him an easy target for the introducer to obtain mortgage advances from lenders on a fraudulent basis, which could have been prevented if Forest Financial had put in place basic financial crime checks,” said Margaret Cole, director of enforcement and financial crime at the FSA.
The regulator said Byrne confessed that no systems or controls existed at the firm to reduce the risk of the business being used to commit mortgage fraud.
“This prohibition serves as another warning to mortgage brokers who accept business from introducers in suspicious circumstances without doing the proper checks,” said Cole.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Banks urge EBA to delay risk benchmarking amid Iran conflict
Risk managers say hypothetical portfolio exercise clashes with severe market turbulence
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit