
CFTC and SEC plan meetings to co-ordinate activities
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) will hold joint meetings in September to address regulatory overlaps, and streamline regulation of financial instruments.
The meetings are to be held on September 2 and 3 and follow the Obama administration's June white paper - Financial regulatory reform: A new foundation - which called for the two bodies to harmonise their operations. After receiving responses from market participants, the agencies will write a report to Congress by September 30, detailing their recommendations.
The paper stipulated that the regulators' report should include recommendations "that would harmonise regulation of futures and securities". It should also identify "all existing conflicts in statutes and regulations with respect to similar types of financial instruments and either explain why those differences are essential to achieve underlying policy objectives with respect to investor protection, market integrity, and price transparency or make recommendations for changes to statutes and regulations that would eliminate the differences".
"There are three areas where this review will most benefit the US public: to address gaps between the two agencies' financial regulatory authorities, to assess the effects of regulatory overlap and to bring appropriate consistency to the two agencies' regulation over similar products, practices and markets," CFTC chairman Gary Gensler explained.
Mary Schapiro, SEC chairman, added the meetings should "build on the progress the CFTC and SEC have made on designing a framework to regulate over-the-counter derivatives". One of the main recommendations of the June paper was that "all standardised OTC derivatives transactions be executed in regulated and transparent venues and cleared through regulated central counterparties".
Several market participants have called for the two agencies to merge. Testifying before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs on June 18, Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner acknowledged that valid reasons existed for a merger. "Congress has considered many times in the past proposals for merging both entities and there is a simple and compelling rationale for doing that. What we propose is to begin by bringing the underlying statutes - which are substantially different for [financial] products with similar attributes - into conformity. We think that helps solve most of the substantive problems that exist by having separate regulation of securities and futures; it won't solve all of them, but it is a necessary step toward any effort to merge [the SEC and CFTC] and we think that is a good challenge to take on right now," he said.
See also: US Treasury would support future SEC/CFTC merger, hints Geithner
Obama reform plans show no progress on OTC derivatives clearing
Merge SEC and CFTC, says former SEC commissioner
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Why the survival of internal models is vital for financial stability
Risk quants say stampede to standardised approaches heightens herding and systemic risks
Crypto custody a bit(coin) closer after US accounting U-turn
Federal banking supervisors expected to eventually relax regimes for safeguarding digital assets
Japan’s regulator stands firm behind Basel as peers buckle
Japanese banks fear being at a disadvantage to rivals as Basel III implementation falters
EU racing to comply with active account rules
Industry wants simpler route to exemptions ahead of ‘challenging’ deadline for new clearing regime
CFTC acting chair: ‘We don’t need a Dodd-Frank for crypto’
US regulator wants real-time market surveillance; focuses on rise of liquidity risk
Large banks safer for CCPs than they get credit for
Plentiful pre-positioned liquidity softens the blow of resolution, new research argues
Basel uniformity fades as members defy dress code
Rule-makers diverge from Basel III standards, denting aims of comparability and fuelling fears over fair competition
Fate of US Treasury clearing deadline to be decided at crunch meeting
Isda chief predicts delay as clearing houses await confirmation of go-live dates