CFTC and SEC plan meetings to co-ordinate activities
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) will hold joint meetings in September to address regulatory overlaps, and streamline regulation of financial instruments.
The meetings are to be held on September 2 and 3 and follow the Obama administration's June white paper - Financial regulatory reform: A new foundation - which called for the two bodies to harmonise their operations. After receiving responses from market participants, the agencies will write a report to Congress by September 30, detailing their recommendations.
The paper stipulated that the regulators' report should include recommendations "that would harmonise regulation of futures and securities". It should also identify "all existing conflicts in statutes and regulations with respect to similar types of financial instruments and either explain why those differences are essential to achieve underlying policy objectives with respect to investor protection, market integrity, and price transparency or make recommendations for changes to statutes and regulations that would eliminate the differences".
"There are three areas where this review will most benefit the US public: to address gaps between the two agencies' financial regulatory authorities, to assess the effects of regulatory overlap and to bring appropriate consistency to the two agencies' regulation over similar products, practices and markets," CFTC chairman Gary Gensler explained.
Mary Schapiro, SEC chairman, added the meetings should "build on the progress the CFTC and SEC have made on designing a framework to regulate over-the-counter derivatives". One of the main recommendations of the June paper was that "all standardised OTC derivatives transactions be executed in regulated and transparent venues and cleared through regulated central counterparties".
Several market participants have called for the two agencies to merge. Testifying before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs on June 18, Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner acknowledged that valid reasons existed for a merger. "Congress has considered many times in the past proposals for merging both entities and there is a simple and compelling rationale for doing that. What we propose is to begin by bringing the underlying statutes - which are substantially different for [financial] products with similar attributes - into conformity. We think that helps solve most of the substantive problems that exist by having separate regulation of securities and futures; it won't solve all of them, but it is a necessary step toward any effort to merge [the SEC and CFTC] and we think that is a good challenge to take on right now," he said.
See also: US Treasury would support future SEC/CFTC merger, hints Geithner
Obama reform plans show no progress on OTC derivatives clearing
Merge SEC and CFTC, says former SEC commissioner
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities