
Positive second-quarter results continue
UK and European banks have posted positive latest second-quarter results, led by strong investment banking revenues - but suffered from tightening credit spreads.
On August 4, BNP Paribas announced a €1.6 billion net profit for the second quarter, representing a 6.6% rise from €1.51 billion recorded in the same quarter in 2008. The firm's investment banking business was the most profitable area, with a pre-tax profit of €1.15 billion.
The bank also received €261 million from its acquisition of Fortis, which was completed in May. However, as a result of the acquisition, the firm also incurred charges of €4.1 billion in writing off goodwills and intangible assets, and fair-value adjustments on assets and liabilities, as well as €3.2 billion in additional provisions for credit risks. The firm also lost €237 million as a result of the revaluation of its own debt.
UK bank Barclays also had a profitable second quarter, with the bulk of the revenue generated by its investment banking business, Barclays Capital. On August 3, the bank announced a net profit of £2.34 billion for the first half of the year, up 10% from £2.13 billion in the previous year.
Barclays Capital saw pre-tax profits double to £1.05 billion from £524 million in the same period in 2008. The investment bank's fixed-income, currency and commodities business had an income of £7.89 billion compared with £3.74 billion in the previous half year in 2008. Income from the bank's equities and prime brokerage services rose to £1.63 billion from £631 million, as a result of its acquisition of Lehman Brothers' US business.
The investment bank also suffered credit market writedowns of £4.68 billion, which included £1.17 billion of impairments and a loss of £893 million on holdings of its own credit compared with a gain of £852 million in the year before.
On August 3, another London-based firm, HSBC, also posted a profit. However, its pre-tax profit shrank to $5.02 billion for the first half of 2009 from $10.25 billion in the same period last year.
Profits were driven by its global banking and markets businesses, which reported a pre-tax profit of $6.3 billion, more than double the figure for the previous year. In addition, commercial banking delivered a pre-tax profit of $2.4 billion in the first half of 2009.
The bank blamed the collapse in its overall profits largely on changes in credit spreads, which incurred a $2.5 billion loss for the firm, compared with a gain of $8 million in the previous year.
Standard Chartered, which also has its global headquarters in London, announced its results on August 4, posting a pre-tax profit of $2.84 billion for the first half of 2009, up 10% from $2.59 billion in the same period in 2008. The most profitable businesses were wholesale banking and consumer banking.
However, the bank also suffered impairment losses on loans and advances and other credit risk provisions of $1.09 billion, more than double the $465 million seen in 2008.
In parallel with its results, the firm also announced it would raise approximately £1 billion through an accelerated book-build. "We are strong and with more capital we will be even stronger," the bank explained.
Swiss bank UBS recorded a second-quarter loss attributable to shareholders of Sfr1.40 billion ($1.32 billion), the bank's third successive quarterly loss.
The firm attributed the negative result to a Sfr1.21 billion charge on its own credit, restructuring charges of Sfr582 million and a goodwill impairment charge of Sfr492 million related to the sale of UBS Pactual, the bank's Latin American business. Excluding these factors, the bank would have posted a pre-tax profit of Sfr971 million, it said.
The investment bank, which has been the main source of UBS's losses in the past few quarters, recorded a pre-tax loss of Sfr1.85 billion, down from the Sfr3.16 billion loss for the first quarter.
See also: European banks report modest Q2, despite increased provisioning
Trading and one-off gains lift bank profits
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
SEC’s Peirce calls for rethink of international standards
Risk Live Boston: regulator rejects international calls for bank-like regulation of investors
Trump tariff turbulence piles pressure on banks’ VAR models
Backtesting breaches start to mount, but too early to tell if regulatory intervention needed
Trading desks want regulators to face down the NMRF monster
Rule-makers in Australia and the European Union are open to changes to the unpopular FRTB test
CFTC’s Doge-inspired drive to enforcement may fall short
Lawyers doubt guidance on rewards for self-reporting goes far enough
FRTB may bite harder for Europe’s CVA modellers
Farther reach of advanced approach and lighter load on total requirements mean limited takeaways from Canada and Japan’s implementation
Can Europe’s FRTB refurb bring banks back to Club IMA?
Softening the NMRF regime permanently might have the most impact, but the output floor still hurts
Japan, Basel III and the pitfalls of being on time
Capital floor phase-in delay may be least-worst option for JFSA as US and Europe waver
Gould stands by OCC decision to end exams for reputation risk
Comptroller nominee also blames SVB failure on poor supervision, not tailoring rule
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2025
- For US Treasury algos, dealers get with the program
- DeepSeek success spurs banks to consider do-it-yourself AI