WRMA rebukes NAIC white paper

The Washington DC-based Weather Risk Management Association (WRMA), has issued a formal response to a draft white paper written by the US National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). In its report, the NAIC claimed that weather derivatives are disguised insurance products and should therefore be regulated as insurance products (see Energy Risk, February 2004, p14).

In its response to the NAIC draft white paper, the WRMA affirmed its stance that weather derivatives are not insurance products. The WRMA argues that when weather derivatives are fully analysed under insurance law, they cannot be classified as an insurance product. “In fact, two fundamental differences exist between insurance products and weather derivatives. First, there is no need for a proof of loss with weather derivatives; they are simply index-based products. Second, in many cases

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here