Editor's letter
While financial institutions in the private sector work together in pursuit of a solution to the liquidity problem dogging the markets, the Chancellor of the Exchequer continues to pour money into Northern Rock: public exposure to the ailing bank now stands at £40 billion, taking emergency lending via the Bank of England and the state's guarantee of deposits together. Alistair Darling, it appears, is hoping a private buyer will appear and take the problem out of his hands, but even the favoured bid by Virgin does not envisage final repayment to the Bank within the next two years. As a going concern, entire in itself, it still looks like the Rock's days could be numbered if this latest bid fails.
Turning to the private sector, which has clearly decided that Northern Rock is too risky a bet unless it comes cheaply, genuine attempts are being made to negotiate the fallout from this summer's volatility. It is not clear if the so-called 'super conduit' M-LEC will be a sufficiently robust intervention to reverse the declining fortunes of the structured investment vehicle (SIV) market, but at least the banks involved are directing their best efforts at finding a solution.
In November members of the Treasury Select Committee distinguished themselves by being overheard condemning representatives of the credit rating agencies as "all foreigners". The ensuing questioning was scarcely more enlightened in parts, as it became clear that the MPs on the Committee weren't entirely familiar with what rating agencies actually do. Maybe they should turn their attentions closer to home.
- Matthew Attwood, Editor.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement
The wisdom of Oz? Why Australia is phasing out AT1s
Analysts think Australian banks will transition smoothly, but other countries unlikely to follow
EU trade repository matching disrupted by Emir overhaul
Some say problem affecting derivatives reporting has been resolved, but others find it persists
Barclays and HSBC opt for FRTB internal models
However, UK pair unlikely to chase approval in time for Basel III go-live in January 2026
Foreign banks want level playing field in US Basel III redraft
IHCs say capital charges for op risk and inter-affiliate trades out of line with US-based peers