IAS 39 still unacceptable, says European official
Frits Bolkestein, European commissioner for the internal market, taxation and customs union, said last week that standards for the treatment of derivatives are still not suitable for adoption, despite recent concessions by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), Risknews, sister publication, FX Week , reports.
Financial instruments standards IAS 32 and 39 are due for adoption by all listed EU companies in 2005, but the commission fears they will cause excess volatility in financial statements, which will destabilise stock markets.
The IASB has been under pressure from politicians and companies to change the treatment of derivatives. Revisions were published last month in response to this, but these have not allayed concerns. The revisions brought the International Accounting Standards closer to the equivalent standard under US generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), but the IASB has not adopted the US version’s exception for the internal netting of hedges. Corporate treasuries previously said this exception would remove a significant amount of potential volatility in accounts.
The IASB has confirmed that it is still considering the issue of macro hedging - where a whole portfolio of different instruments is hedged on a net basis - and discussed the issue further at its board meeting last week.
All International Standards are due for final publication in March, but will not be adopted until approved by the European Commission. Bolkestein suggested that a working group might have to reconsider the standards before approval is given.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU banks hedge net interest income to pass new IRRBB test
Would-be outliers look to cut sensitivity of cashflows to rate moves, but at what cost?
Banks cry foul over shock decision from Basel Committee
Asset and liability management professionals question severity of criteria in revised IRRBB tests
Fresh EU push for single securities supervisor to compete with US
But MEP expresses ‘concern’ EU nations will stall revival of capital markets union
Discord deepens over fund-linked trades in FRTB
More banks use punitive approach to capital treatment under new trading book regime, irking regulators
AI, quantum computing and tokenisation set to transform finance – Menon
But significant barriers remain preventing the technologies from unlocking their full potential
Could the SEC revive the private fund adviser rule?
Industry experts deem a second life for the reviled rule unlikely
Vendors lack silver bullet for FRTB’s fund-linked issue
EU and UK legislators tried to ease capital charge by leaning on vendors, but problems persist
Does Basel’s internal loss multiplier add up?
As US agencies mull capital reforms, one regulator questions past losses as an indicator of future op risk