Australian regulatory body to investigate risk management controls at NAB
The Australia Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA) is launching an investigation into the risk management controls at National Australia Bank’s (NAB) treasury division. This follows the bank's announcement on Tuesday that it faces losses of up to A$180 million relating to unauthorised trading in foreign exchange options.
Ross Jones, deputy chairman at APRA, said the review was standard regulatory practice in cases of this nature. “From a prudential perspective, APRA has to ensure that any breakdown of controls and processes in this instance has been properly identified and that appropriate action has been taken by the institution in question to rectify the matter,” he said.
In the short term, APRA will also specifically review the risk management practices of authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) with treasury functions. “APRA is in constant dialogue with the ADIs it regulates and does not have any specific concerns about individual institutions or the industry in general,” said Jones. “However, both APRA and the industry recognise the importance of reassuring the community and the industry review is part of that process.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules